Would you recommend Caltex Ron92 or Esso92(equivalent)?

Morning everybody

Today i just pumped full tank of caltex ron92.
But after some search in the forum, i realise that some bro and sis complained that cal ron92 make the forte acceleration rough. And they prefer Esso92(equivalent).

Actually i am more concern if this will "hurt" my precious forte.

Maybe those who used cal r92 want to share their experience in this fuel grade and also those who have technical knowledge to contribute on the impact?

BTW caltex station are hard to find!!

Thanks and i wish you all a good day!

pump 95 or 98? I have heard negative stuff about Caltex but I still fill up with them, Safra member have 12% discount

ya i convert from shell95 to caltex92 because i got coporate discount at 14%.
hehe

i'm using VPower. confirm dem smoooooooooth.

woa rich wor, urs 1.6 or 2.0?

longbow wrote:woa rich wor, urs 1.6 or 2.0?

see my siggy la dei.

not rich la. i dun use the koup for my daily use so a few extra bucks over the weekend for better driving enjoyment is worth it.

Price of VPower = 2.119
Avg Pr of 92 Ron = 1.787

Price difference = 0.332, .....

on the average, we pump 2000 litres of petrol a year, therefore you spend an average of 670 dollars more on petrol against someone who uses 92 ron... that's 670 dollars burnt....

wah that alot man!
anyway if you enjoy your ride thats ok haha

BTW coming back to the topic on caltex ron92...
anybody got any comment on its performance?

do take note that 1.6 or 2.0 engines are different, they may respond differently

i pump clatex 95 no problem lay lolx

I must say, Esso feels better than Caltex irregardless of which grade imho.

But recently, i always pump VPower or Esso F1 in JB....

Keep going in and out..

The diff in price between 92 and 95 is about 5 cents / L

The diff between the 95 and 98 is almost 10 cents / L

Personally, I use 95 for my bike and car...

Caltex + OCBC @ 12% discount...