Who would be at fault?
+9
kapitan
lawrenceke
whitechoco
Paranoid_7
Terrier
keigo
Xenthias
JuanST
patsy
13 posters
Page 1 of 1
Who would be at fault?
I was driving down Claymore Hill turning left to Stevens Road yesterday, I was the first car waiting for the light to turn green. Once the light turned green, I moved forward to turn left then had to jam break because this merc beat the red light and was speeding down the road. Luckily my friend was in the car with me and he shouted for me to stop, otherwise I would have hit him smack right in the middle of his car. Good thing I wasn't going fast as I had come from a stationary position.
But if I had hit him, who would have been at fault? I am very very sure the turning light was green.
Just for info only.... never ever want a repeat!
But if I had hit him, who would have been at fault? I am very very sure the turning light was green.
Just for info only.... never ever want a repeat!
patsy- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
unless it is captured unequivocally that he is beating red light...it will be 50/50...
in this case, get witnesses other than ur passenger to prove that urs is green and his is red......
better if there is a red light camera....
in this case, get witnesses other than ur passenger to prove that urs is green and his is red......
better if there is a red light camera....
JuanST- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
if it is 50/50, u lose.....his car far more expensive than urs....
JuanST- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
u have to have evidence he beat the red light. if so u should be 100% rite. if not....then its rather debutable
Xenthias- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
correct.. in this case you will need some witnesses to prove that when you move off it is green light.
keigo- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
In this case, if you are hitting the merc rear.. then you are at fault.. because there's no specify evidence of him beating red light..
now LTA have deploy multiple CCTV near cross junction traffic lights.. if there's such accident occurs.. then lookout for this camera and report LTA to replay it and claim against insurance..
if you did not see such camera, then u will be at the losing end.. depending the driver admit is his fault and he pay for his dmg and u pay for his dmg or he fully point the blame on u and claim 100% thru u..
afraid of such incident, then install blackbox.. it does helped in such incident and u can 100% claim against him
now LTA have deploy multiple CCTV near cross junction traffic lights.. if there's such accident occurs.. then lookout for this camera and report LTA to replay it and claim against insurance..
if you did not see such camera, then u will be at the losing end.. depending the driver admit is his fault and he pay for his dmg and u pay for his dmg or he fully point the blame on u and claim 100% thru u..
afraid of such incident, then install blackbox.. it does helped in such incident and u can 100% claim against him
Terrier- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
I would have hit his front left side, not back, if I didn't break in time.... good thing i was going slow then!
patsy- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
in traffic rules.. any car turning must give way..
in your scenario if without evidences or eye witness.. and your car is turning.. means you are still in the losing end
always remember "Right Hand Rules"
in your scenario if without evidences or eye witness.. and your car is turning.. means you are still in the losing end
always remember "Right Hand Rules"
Terrier- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
I would have hit his front left side, not back, if I didn't break in time.... good thing i was going slow then!
patsy- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
Base on Barometer Of Liability Agreement. Cars turning will be at fault, although traffic light is in your favour. Cos the other party might be write that when he pass by the traffic was ember.
http://www.gia.org.sg/pdfs/Barometer%20of%20Liability%20Chart%20v3%20dated%201%20Jun%2008.pdf
http://www.gia.org.sg/pdfs/Barometer%20of%20Liability%20Chart%20v3%20dated%201%20Jun%2008.pdf
Paranoid_7- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
however, its a controlled x junction. if its always the turning car at fault, no one will bother abt the traffic lights since pple turning will be scared/intimidated?
even at traffic ember, the car should not be speeding as he should be already at slow speed.....
juz my 2cents hehe
even at traffic ember, the car should not be speeding as he should be already at slow speed.....
juz my 2cents hehe
Xenthias- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
Yah, I agree with you to that. Cars shouldn't be speeding when approaching traffic lights, but ultimately its driver who decide.
That link I gave is the chart where all insurance will base on if an accident happen. Believe me some of them are not fair. Final advice is if an accident do happen try to get an eye witness, not the person in the car. As for Patsy liability is on him.
That link I gave is the chart where all insurance will base on if an accident happen. Believe me some of them are not fair. Final advice is if an accident do happen try to get an eye witness, not the person in the car. As for Patsy liability is on him.
Paranoid_7- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
can i ask a qn here too?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
lawrenceke- Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
50/50
Reason: Both party do not want to give way. Base on BOLA Chart Figure 18.
Reason: Both party do not want to give way. Base on BOLA Chart Figure 18.
Paranoid_7- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
lawrenceke wrote:can i ask a qn here too?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
give way to car on the right.....
kapitan- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
kapitan wrote:lawrenceke wrote:can i ask a qn here too?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
give way to car on the right.....
give way to the car at the right even if he is half a car length slower than me? if i slow down, become road hog leh..
lawrenceke- Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
lawrenceke wrote:kapitan wrote:lawrenceke wrote:can i ask a qn here too?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
give way to car on the right.....
give way to the car at the right even if he is half a car length slower than me? if i slow down, become road hog leh..
have patience and give way, you will feel better.... if you step more on your accelerator, you get angry... what's losing a few seconds....
kapitan- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
by road merging rules.... whoever is ahead has the right of way... but if i am ahead and the fellow beside me accelerate...and if it is an iffy situation, i will slow down and let him pass.... no point spending too much moolah on a side collision which will definitely be 50-50 judgement. safety or pride.... safety wins....kapitan wrote:lawrenceke wrote:kapitan wrote:lawrenceke wrote:can i ask a qn here too?
if merging lanes, yr car is faster and ahead of the other car merging 2 lanes to 1 and this slower car instead of slowing down, speeds up and bang yr car at the side.. who's at fault? the faster one or the slower car?
give way to car on the right.....
give way to the car at the right even if he is half a car length slower than me? if i slow down, become road hog leh..
have patience and give way, you will feel better.... if you step more on your accelerator, you get angry... what's losing a few seconds....
especially if the other fellow is driving a bus or a lorry.....
JuanST- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
i encounted 2 times at the same merging road. once was a modded suzuki swift driven by a malay, i was ahead of him by 3/4 car length, signaled and was half into the merging lane then he just horn me n nearly hit my back.. i slow down n let him pass.. he was on the same route to my hse. followed him far and noticed him driving recklessly. regretted giving way to him..
lawrenceke- Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
lawrenceke wrote:i encounted 2 times at the same merging road. once was a modded suzuki swift driven by a malay, i was ahead of him by 3/4 car length, signaled and was half into the merging lane then he just horn me n nearly hit my back.. i slow down n let him pass.. he was on the same route to my hse. followed him far and noticed him driving recklessly. regretted giving way to him..
u did the right thing..... dun regret.... if he wants to die... he can die alone.... no need for u to accompany him....
JuanST- Senior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
lawrenceke wrote:i encounted 2 times at the same merging road. once was a modded suzuki swift driven by a malay, i was ahead of him by 3/4 car length, signaled and was half into the merging lane then he just horn me n nearly hit my back.. i slow down n let him pass.. he was on the same route to my hse. followed him far and noticed him driving recklessly. regretted giving way to him..
Is that necessary....
Cypher- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
Install an in car camera... will save a lot headaches explaining....
Cypher- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
I agree. Juz give way. Dun eva feel regret. At least your car is safe from accident.
Paranoid_7- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
drive carefully...lots of unreasonable drivers out there
Dummyhalf- Junior Member
Re: Who would be at fault?
if u really want to be right, then be on the "right side" of the merging lane
j1eann1e- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
patsy wrote:I was driving down Claymore Hill turning left to Stevens Road yesterday, I was the first car waiting for the light to turn green. Once the light turned green, I moved forward to turn left then had to jam break because this merc beat the red light and was speeding down the road. Luckily my friend was in the car with me and he shouted for me to stop, otherwise I would have hit him smack right in the middle of his car. Good thing I wasn't going fast as I had come from a stationary position.
But if I had hit him, who would have been at fault? I am very very sure the turning light was green.
Just for info only.... never ever want a repeat!
make sure all the cars have stopped at the traffic light before moving off from turning lane.
j1eann1e- Newbie
Re: Who would be at fault?
It's sad that sometimes not our fault but still pay the price for their reckless driving.
______________________
Video Car maintenance Guide:
http://www.mobilpac.com
______________________
______________________
Video Car maintenance Guide:
http://www.mobilpac.com
______________________
iseethesun- Newbie
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
4th August 2011, 10:13 pm by Guest
» APP Leading Website Generator
4th August 2011, 11:47 am by Guest
» check-up
4th August 2011, 10:03 am by Guest
» Blu-ray to iPad Ripper lift Blu glimmer DVD movies quest of iPad
4th August 2011, 8:24 am by Guest
» ubiquitous
4th August 2011, 6:07 am by Guest
» South african indian dating. Nz internet dating.
3rd August 2011, 8:57 pm by Guest
» WHAT CREEPY IDEA ON YOUTUBE HASN'T ALREADY BEEN DONE YET?
3rd August 2011, 7:30 pm by Guest
» buy facebook fan f8
3rd August 2011, 3:15 pm by Guest
» division
3rd August 2011, 11:43 am by Guest